I don't have it in front of me, and wouldn't sully my fingers with anything he'd touched, but I'm guessing Peter Poulos MP's To-Do list reads something like: Chemist - Betadine and opsite bandages. Why would Poulos need Betadine and opsite bandages, you ask? Well, it's to treat his macerated arse cheeks. I am aware nobody wants to contemplate Poulos' arse cheeks, but they have been chewed and gnawed to pulpy shreds by his own pathetic actions in circulating nude pictures of a political candidate in 2018, in an attempt to discredit her. Yes, his nasty stunt is now biting him on the arse like a row of frenetic Pac-mans, all going chomp-chomp-chomp like the clappers.
I have read numerous calls for Poulos to be charged under revenge porn laws, but from what I can tell, the pictures that were circulated were in the public domain, having been featured in a Penthouse magazine pictorial in the 1980s. It's unlikely the woman concerned owns the rights to those images so therefore had no 'consent' to give in their circulation. She's moved on, going so far as to claim she and Poulos are mates. Madam, if you're reading this, take it from me: Poulos is NOT your mate. He's a grubby backstabber out for himself.
Poulos probably hasn't broken the law. However, he has shown himself to be a venal, malicious, sexist, nasty, spiteful shit stain in the underpants of humanity. He apologised for making a 'regrettable mistake'. Poulsie, let me clarify something for you. This is not a regrettable mistake. A regrettable mistake is misreading a recipe and putting in one tablespoon of chilli powder instead of the one teaspoon sought by the recipe. (As an aside, I've done this and it's not fun). This was a vile and calculated attempt to destroy a woman's reputation in the pettiest way possible. I'm guessing your then boss didn't have the right stuff for a deserved meritorious win, so you chose to attack another candidate using the most disgusting weapon available to you: The Reputation Destroyer. You thought you could get her to back down by attacking her for having the unholy temerity to make her own choice and pose nude in a magazine. Whether you agree with her actions or not is immaterial; her actions were LEGAL.
I'm trying to establish how old you are, but if you're in my age bracket, you might think of a ditty from high school: Centerfold by J Geils Band. You remind me of the incel-like narrator who takes the high moral ground over someone who's decided, for whatever reason, to partake in a nude pictorial. The narrator of this song admits at the end he's going to buy the magazine (hypocrite!). I don't know you well enough, but I would not be surprised if you jerk off to the material created by the people whom you seem quick to criticise. If you do find arousal in visual erotica, that's no issue to me. What I do have issue with is your hypocrisy and utter nastiness.
Anyway, your disgusting behaviour didn't work, did it? The woman got voted in and now everybody just thinks you're a spiteful dingleberry swinging around in the hairs that surround Satan's butt crack.
Slut-shaming as a weapon is ineffectual, as it should be. Women can make choices and you can just suck it.
You're not fit to hold office Kindly resign. And flatten the edges of those opsite bandages so they don't peel away too quickly.
No comments:
Post a Comment